01772aea3

Rob Landley

2006-06-30

SOURCE BUG Duration: 28s

Subject

Annoint 1.2.0.

SOURCE BUG

This commit was genuinely broken at the time (not related to our build system): scripts/config/mkconfigs.c (2005-08-01 - 2006-10-05 arasi) uretilen bbconfigopts.h icine .config satirlarini kacissiz, ham newline'larla gömüyordu - gecerli C degildi, busybox'un kendi bb_mkdep araci bile parse edemiyordu (7d219aab7 ile duzeltildi, mkconfigs shell scripte cevrildi)

→ Bu hatanin tam hikayesini ve duzeltme diffini gor

Binary

No binary (build failed)

Architecture & Compiler Flags

Architecture: x86_64-linux-gnu Compiler: gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04.3) 11.4.0

—

Build Log

(log yok)

Commit Diff GitHub →

Rules.mak +1 -1 docs/busybox.net/news.html +11 -0

Rules.mak+1 -1

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ PROG := busybox
	MAJOR_VERSION :=1
	MINOR_VERSION :=2
	SUBLEVEL_VERSION:=0
-	EXTRAVERSION :=-pre0
+	EXTRAVERSION :=
	VERSION :=$(MAJOR_VERSION).$(MINOR_VERSION).$(SUBLEVEL_VERSION)$(EXTRAVERSION)
	BUILDTIME := $(shell TZ=UTC date -u "+%Y.%m.%d-%H:%M%z")

docs/busybox.net/news.html+11 -0

@@ -2,6 +2,17 @@


	<ul>
+	<li><b>30 June 2006 -- BusyBox 1.2.0</b>
+	<p>The -devel branch has been stabilized and the result is
+	<a href="http://busybox.net/downloads/busybox-1.2.0.tar.bz2">Busybox
+	1.2.0</a>. Lots of stuff changed, I need to work up a decent changelog
+	over the weekend.</p>
+
+	<p>I'm still experimenting with how long is best for the development
+	cycle, and since we've got some largeish projects queued up I'm going to
+	try a longer one. Expect 1.3.0 in December. (Expect 1.2.1 any time
+	we fix enough bugs. :)</p>
+
	<li><b>17 May 2006 -- BusyBox 1.1.3 (stable)</b>
	<p><a href="http://busybox.net/downloads/busybox-1.1.3.tar.bz2">BusyBox
	1.1.3</a> is another bugfix release. It makes passwd use salt, fixes a