← Commit list

c50493854

Denys Vlasenko
Denys Vlasenko
2014-03-16
SUCCESS Duration: 150s

Subject

libbb: fix a bad check for uclibc >= 0.9.31

Binary

No binary (build failed)

Architecture & Compiler Flags

Architecture: x86_64-linux-gnu Compiler: gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04.3) 11.4.0

—

Build Log

(log yok)

Commit Diff GitHub →

libbb/xreadlink.c+7 -4
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
/* vi: set sw=4 ts=4: */
/*
* xreadlink.c - safe implementation of readlink.
- * Returns a NULL on failure...
+ * Returns a NULL on failure.
*
* Licensed under GPLv2, see file LICENSE in this source tree.
*/
#include "libbb.h"
-/* some systems (eg Hurd) does not have MAXSYMLINKS definition,
+/* Some systems (eg Hurd) do not have MAXSYMLINKS definition,
* set it to some reasonable value if it isn't defined */
#ifndef MAXSYMLINKS
# define MAXSYMLINKS 20
@@ -108,8 +108,11 @@ char* FAST_FUNC xmalloc_readlink_or_warn(const char *path)
char* FAST_FUNC xmalloc_realpath(const char *path)
{
-#if defined(__GLIBC__) || \
- (defined(__UCLIBC__) && UCLIBC_VERSION >= KERNEL_VERSION(0, 9, 31))
+/* NB: uclibc also defines __GLIBC__
+ * Therefore the test "if glibc, or uclibc >= 0.9.31" looks a bit weird:
+ */
+#if defined(__GLIBC__) && \
+ (!defined(__UCLIBC__) || UCLIBC_VERSION >= KERNEL_VERSION(0, 9, 31))
/* glibc provides a non-standard extension */
/* new: POSIX.1-2008 specifies this behavior as well */
return realpath(path, NULL);